Talk:Quell relief
Please do not create new infobox categories. Change the "therapeutic devices" to "torso-mounted".--Haustein (talk) 10:55, 14 October 2015 (CEST)
Do not create new infobox categories! If you wish to mention the size of the device, move the dimension category inside the Main characteristics section instead. The infobox table should be the very first thing on the page, swap it's place with the introductory paragraph.
Do not divide the Main characteristics section into new sub-sections (Usage etc.). Use only the sections provided by the template.
You have many trailing empty lines, such as the one after ADVANCE™ System line under the Company and People section. This creates an unnecessary empty line.
The Important dates section lacks references.
Ethical Issues section is empty. If there are no ethical issues relevant to the device, write about that too, don't leave the section empty. The same applies to the Relevant projects section.
The reference for the first sentence in the Health issues section is formatted incorrectly.
Pay attention to the correct reference placement. The way it should be is bla blabla.[1] and not bla bla bla [1]..
There are some confusing expressions and wording throughout the article, for example the expression Except of company's.
You are using the same reference multiple times incorrectly, which in turn creates the same reference multiple times in the References list. Please see the Getting_started_on_HCE_wiki#Add_a_reference to learn how to fix it. --Haustein (talk) 09:51, 16 November 2015 (CET)
The infobox <table> should be the very first thing in the source code of your page. That way, the infobox will be correctly displayed in the top right corner and not under the first paragraph like right now.
The category in the infobox is incorrect.
Release date, price, date... every specific piece of information in the infobox needs to have a proper reference added.
Add a reference to the mention about FDA approval in the first paragraph. You mention that TENS was described already in 19th century, add a reference to it. The last sentence about Quell in the 21st century is not really clear, try to rephrase it.
The Principle section could use more references. Do no use expressions as "should be", these do not belong into academic style of writing. Also, pay attention to the phrasing of some sentences.
The last sentence under the Company & People is unfinished.
Some dates under the Important Dates section has no references.
Ethical Issues section needs some serious proof-reading. The sentences are hard to read.
The FDA approval in Health Risks needs a reference. It doesn't have to be the approval document itself, other sources will be enough.
There are issues with the style of the text. Some sentences are pretty convoluted.
We discussed the rest of the issues during my office hours.--Haustein (talk) 15:46, 11 December 2015 (CET)
