User talk:Lucie Hrubcova

From HCE Wiki - The Human Cognitive Enhancement Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to HCE Wiki - The Human Cognitive Enhancement Wiki! We hope you will contribute much and well. You will probably want to read the help pages and Guides. Again, welcome! Zuzka (talk) 15:59, 20 September 2016 (CEST)

some comments to TDCS-KIT‎‎'s entry

Dear Ms. Hrubcova,

thank you for your contribution. You made a great deal of a good work. Your entry is nearly finished. There are, however, a few issues which should be fixed until I give you my approval.

1, You use a considerable amount of quotations as 'Some neurostimulation devices are already classified and regulated as medical devices by FDA. For example, in 2011, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.' (which you even reuse twice). Try, please, to rewrite some of them by your own words.

2, You use a two type of parentheses. The one which is used in British English ' and the one which is used in American English ". Choose, please, just one version and use it through the entry.

3, You have no reference in the paragraph, where you discuss the affection of psyche. Please, add the source of the information.

4, There should be also references (if they are available) to the articles, which you discuss in the section Public & Media Impact and Presentation (I mean the articles listed by bullet points).

5, Finally, the references should be in ISO 690 style, which means: The name (or the nick name reps. the owner of the domain). The title of a paper (article, entry,...). The medium. The date of publication. etc. For precise form of each medium, please consult https://sites.google.com/site/novaiso690/home.

If you have any comments or questions, do not hesitate to contact me.

Kindest regards,

--Zuzka (talk) 13:42, 16 February 2017 (CET)

Dear Ms. Hrubcova,

thank you very much for your corrections.

Although, the majority of issues were solved, I have three comments to your entry.

Firstly, you should delete the information about psyche.

Secondly, there are still references which are not in ISO 690 style. Namely, the references from Youtube, JOVE, BBC, Electrode Positioning, and Reddit lack the information about the author, title and the date of publication, even though, these information are available (at least some of them).

Thirdly, please check the references. There lacks a gap between link and the information about the retrieval, which makes the link malfunctioning.

Best regards,

--Zuzka (talk) 18:17, 19 February 2017 (CET)

Dear Ms Rybaříková,

thank you for your answer. I am sorry, but I didn´t know, that links need ISO 690 style, when they are only recommendation, which website to see/find, eg youtube or electrode positioning. I thought, that only a link is enough, in case it is no quotation. I try to edit it, but in some cases, I am not sure, in what way. When it will be done, I let you know.

Kind regards,

Lucie Hrubcová